4105 vs 3320
ausman
Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 3 Australia |
2011-09-16 180414
Any opinion or experience please.
For the same dollar outlay which is the better "all round use" choice between a 4105 with (2 range hydrostatic 40hp)or a 3320 with (12x12 power reverser 33hp) Note the 3320 does have greater torque and is not turbocharged.
Reply to | Quote Reply | Add Photo
4105 vs 3320
hardwood
Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3583 iowa |
2011-09-18 180421
What have you been used to driving? A tractor with a clutch or something with a hydro?
I've always preferred the 12/12 because of driving tractors all my life with the same setup, a clutch on the left and brake pedals on the right. I've just always felt more in control with the 12/12.
Frank. ....
Reply to | Quote Reply | Add Photo
4105 vs 3320
ausman
Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 3 Australia |
2011-09-18 180431
Thank you Hardwood for your reply. I currently have a 5085M with a "Sync Reverser" ie clutch before foward into reverse and vice versa. If you miss-time the clutch you go no where and an error message requires the clutch be depressed again to reset the error. Some argue the system is a more robust transmission for heavy hauling but I think that might have been spin to convince me to accept the combination available at the time over waiting for one with a "Power Reverser". Re which tractor 4105 or 3320
I have decided on a 3320 over a 4105-Order goes in today. ....
Reply to | Quote Reply | Add Photo
4105 vs 3320
hardwood
Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3583 iowa |
2011-09-18 180433
My 4310 12/12 power reverser is a pretty close cousin of the 3320 power reverser. I bought mine new in 2000 or 2001 and have been pleased enough that if I were to trade tomorrow I'd get a 12/12 again.
Frank. ....
Reply to | Quote Reply | Add Photo
Go Top
Share This