Go BottomNew 200CX loader for 2210
 | jd2210
Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 112 IN 
 Pics
|
2005-05-23 111411
As you may know, the 210 loader for the 2210 is being replaced with either (your choice) a 200X or 200CX. The 200X is a cheaper and requires a bit more time to take if off the tractor, when compared to the 200CX. Anyway, I looked the 200CX over closely and apparently the folks at Deere designed it very similar to a Kubota in that the attaching points are really on the bar under the tractor and you can remove the 200CX from the seat. The down fall in my view is the remaining large casters on top the bar which is under the tractor and thus, leaves you will the large post sticking up from that bar.
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
 | 2210jd
Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 18 southwestern Michigan
|
2005-05-23 111426
I was unaware of this. Do you know why Deere is doing away with the 210 loader ? ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
| JDeere2210
Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2 Maryland
|
2005-07-17 113571
Deere is doing away with the 210 loader? Or have they just made some changes and are renaming it? I have a 210 loader... works great and installs in minutes. ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
 | bmeyer
Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 175 Central Wisconsin
Pics
|
2005-07-18 113585
Does the new CX lift more? I've been pleased with my 210 loader. Any pictures of the new loader(s)?
....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
 | JDFANATIC
Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 119 Southington, CT
Pics
|
2005-07-19 113651
I was at my dealer last weekend and they had a 2210 with the new 200X loader on the lot. The 200X is NOT a quick-tach loader. IMO it also looks quite a lot less substancial than the 210 (the weldment parts). Instead of being all fabricated, the stantions are cast and the mating part (on the tractor) sticks out as it did on the 210, but also up in the air. If I were in the market for a 2210 today, I'd be pushing my dealer to find a leftover 210; knowing that someday the 200X/CX will be the only available loaders. On the design front though, I have to assume the new loader was engineered properly and that it performs as required.
JDFANATIC ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
 | ScooterMagee
Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 201 Nebraska
Pics
|
2005-07-19 113655
I was just looking at the JD web site, and it appears that 200X loader is meant to replace both the 210 for the 2210, as well as the 410 for the 4100/4110/4115. Is that correct? ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add PhotoNew 200CX loader for 2210
| JDFANATIC
Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 119 Southington, CT
Pics
|
2005-07-19 113657
Scooter,
That's how I understand it. This is in anticipation of the new 2210 this August, which will be followed by the 4010, 4110, and 4115 replacements (take a guess at the numbers -- 2220, 2320, 2420, and 2520 perhaps?)
JDFANATIC ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add Photo
Go Top
Share This