Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons: Autos -- Subaru  -- Cars Discussion Forum and Review Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons: Autos -- Subaru -- Cars Discussion Forum

  parts   |   manuals   |   discussion   |   photos   |   podcast   |   reviews   |   specs   |   dealers   |   classifieds   |   contact   |   faq   |   myProfile   |   home          Login Now | Sign Up


FAQ:   What is a tractor?

Forum Index
New As Posted | Active Subjects



www.emerichsales.com - New & Used Equipment
          View Tractors For Sale!


www.partsbynet.com - Lawn and Garden Equipment Parts


Bernardsville Landscape Lighting
Click to Post a New Message!

Discussion Boards > Active Subjects > Messages as Posted > Autos -- Subaru Forum

Page [ 1 ] | 2 | 3 | | Next >>
Reply | Pop Up Window Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo
 02-12-2008, 11:27 Post: 151270
DennisCTB

TP Contributor

View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: NorthWest NJ
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2544

2
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

I just visited the Subaru site and looked at the way they build their Boxer engine. What are the pros and cons of this design? And if it is such a good idea why don't other manufacturerss do likewise (patented, how long has Subaru been doing this)?






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 11:52 Post: 151273
kwschumm



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW Oregon
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 5764

7
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

I don't think they have a patent, Porsche and Ferrari (among others) have both sold boxer engines.

My relatively uninformed opinion follows.

Pros: (pretty much off the Subaru web site)
Low CG
Better engine balance
Less intrusion into passenger compartment in crash

Cons:
More difficult to uniformly lubricate cylinder walls
Difficult to fit engine and suspension in the same space

I wonder if they will last as long as a more upright design
as the miles accumulate due to lubrication issues.

In the Subaru implementation they should have used a timing
chain instead of a belt.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 12:09 Post: 151275
Murf

TP Contributor

View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 7012

5
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

From a mechanical point of view, the biggest advantage other than those listed, is the lack of vibration.

The boxer configuration means each pair of cylinders balance each other, as one moves so does its mate, balancing each other out.

As for the timing chain, that's another controversy, I'd rather have a belt than a chain.

Best of luck.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 12:26 Post: 151276
kwschumm



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW Oregon
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 5764

7
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murf | view 151275
As for the timing chain, that's another controversy, I'd rather have a belt than a chain.Best of luck.



Why is that? The belt is quieter but beyond that I see only disadvantages.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 12:49 Post: 151277
Murf

TP Contributor

View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 7012

5
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

Any time you have a moving (especially turning) part in an engine it needs to be balanced, and the more it weighs the more work it is to get it balanced.

A timing chain weighs a lot more than a belt, so it is more parasitic losses due to imbalance and extra weight to turn it.

A belt or chain is a wear item, it only has a limited life span and will need to be changed, granted the chain has a longer life, but I would rather change the belt and know it's fine then wait for the chain to hand grenade the engine.

Best of luck.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 16:49 Post: 151285
kwschumm



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW Oregon
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 5764

7
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

Good arguments Murf.

You haven't convinced me, but good arguments nonetheless.

I'm an advocate of changing the timing chain with every valve job Smile and exchanging strength for marginally better balance in this application doesn't seem like a good trade to me.

But belts work fine, they're just a PIA/expensive to change. If all engines with belts were non-interference I'd feel a little better about them.

Anyone know if the Subaru is an interference engine?






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 17:16 Post: 151287
cutter



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: The South Shore of Lake Ontario, New York
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1292

2
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

There have been plenty of auto builders over the years utilizing the boxer engine. VW is one that comes to mind immediately, I froze in one just like everyone else up north Smile






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-12-2008, 19:57 Post: 151289
cutter



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: The South Shore of Lake Ontario, New York
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1292

2
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

I forgot to mention, that car "feels" like it has two more cylinders than it actually does.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-13-2008, 10:03 Post: 151303
Murf

TP Contributor

View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 7012

5
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

Ken, I hear what you're saying, but with todays modern materials the belts are far stronger than they need to be.

Bear in mind though, a chain is only 'supposed' to have the same life expectancy as a belt. It's just people don't worry about chains. Early belts gave the concept a bad rap because of breakage or skipping teeth on a bad backfire and then causing the 'interference' part to rear it's ugly head.

Best of luck.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 02-13-2008, 11:23 Post: 151307
kwschumm



View my Photos

View my Photos  Pics
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW Oregon
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 5764

7
Filter by User
 Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons

Murf, if what you're saying is correct then you have to wonder why manufacturers continue to specify a 75k-100k maintenance item to change the timing belts. I've never heard of a maintenance item for chain replacement but I agree that changing one when the mileage is >100k and the engine is otherwise going repairs (water pump, front seal, heads off, etc) would be a good idea.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

Reply | Pop Up Window Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo


Page [ 1 ] | 2 | 3 | | Next >>

Discussion Boards > Active Subjects > Messages as Posted > Autos -- Subaru Forum

Thread 151270 Filter by Poster:
auerbach 1 | chuckles 1 | cutter 2 | DennisCTB 2 | DRankin 2 | hardwood 1 | kwschumm 7 | Murf 5 | phxmotor 1 |




Most Viewed

+ Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons
+ Trading Honda Pilot or CRV for 2012 Subaru Impreza
+ 2014 Subaru XV Crosstrek vs CRV and RAV4 Review
+ New 2008 Subaru Impreza Today
+ 2012 Subaru Impreza Redesign Review
+ New Legacy Today!
+ 2013 Subaru Crosstrek
+ 2013 Subaru WRX 5 door Hatch

Most Discussion

+ Trading Honda Pilot or CRV for
+ Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons
+ New Legacy Today!
+ New 2008 Subaru Impreza Today
+ 2012 Subaru Impreza Redesign R
+ 2014 Subaru XV Crosstrek vs CR
+ 2013 Subaru Crosstrek
+ 2013 Subaru WRX 5 door Hatch

Newest Topics

+ 2014 Subaru XV Crosstrek vs CRV and RAV4 Review
+ 2013 Subaru WRX 5 door Hatch
+ 2013 Subaru Crosstrek
+ Trading Honda Pilot or CRV for 2012 Subaru Impreza
+ 2012 Subaru Impreza Redesign Review
+ New 2008 Subaru Impreza Today
+ Subaru Boxer Engine Pros Cons
+ New Legacy Today!













Turbochargers for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Cab Glass for Tractors and Industrial Machines

Alternators for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Radiators for Tractors and Industrial Machines

Driveline Components for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Starter Motors for Tractors and Industrial Machines