Tractorpoint Search for

tractorpoint.com - The leader in Tractors from Compacts, to Utility, to Full Size Tractors! Kubota, John Deere, New Holland, Kioti, Case/IH, and Others. Keywords=Compact Tractor, Kubota Tractors, Kioti Tractors, JD, John Deere Tractors, New Holland, Case Boomer, Used Tractors, Classifieds, Dealer Directory, Tractor Pictures / Images

parts | discussion | photos | podcast | reviews | specs | dealers | classifieds | contact | faq | myProfile | home Login Now | Sign Up

Search for =

Topic

My dealer here in CT has three of them. Looked pretty nice, although I could nit-pick about a few things. Price is pretty competitive too.

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

2520 JD
John Deere Tractors
Replies 12 Post by JDFANATIC

Go with the FEL (make sure it is the 200CX which is quick-tach) and you will never regret the decision -- even when it comes time to trade-up or in!

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

jd2305 fel
John Deere Tractors
Replies 9 Post by JDFANATIC

The differences compared to a full CUT will be with things like a Box Blade (you will probably need a shallow one designed for a sub-CUT, but it will still do a good job), and this will go for all the attachments on down the line, it will have to be sized for your tractor. However, you will be able to run a 50" tiller, the loader will have decent lift capacity etc. If a backhoe is in your plans, you might want to look at larger machines (the Kubota does offer this, and there are aftermarket models for the Deere), but if that is an intended use, then I recommend you look larger. As for mowing, a sub-CUT does and excellent job at this. If I were you, I would think carefully about your usage, test drive several machines and colors, think about dealer support, and then make your decision.

Happy hunting!

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

JD2210 3ph Question
John Deere Tractors
Replies 5 Post by JDFANATIC

Factor that difference over the years you will have the tractor, and it is really peanuts. Go with the machine you are most comfortable with (also factor in the dealer).

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

2305 massey 2300 or new holl tz25da
John Deere Tractors
Replies 12 Post by JDFANATIC

Its all a function of how high up and how far out that weight is. For example, a poster at TBN decided to test the 2210/210 loader capacity (53" bucket) and found the following:<br>
Full height (68") 750 lbs.<br>
61" 800 lbs.<br>
51" 850 lbs.<br>
45" 900 lbs.<br>
38" 950 lbs.<br>
16" 1170 lbs.<br>
I'll bet the 2210/210 could lift 600 lbs. 36" high, but it would depend on how far out front that weight is distributed. Ballast weight will be critical!<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
JDFANATIC<br>
JD2210

2210 loader lifting capacity
John Deere Tractors
Replies 7 Post by JDFANATIC

I don't think he'll find too many deals on new 210 loaders, they have been replaced by the 200X and 200CX. If I were in the market for a loader for the 2210 and had a choice between the 210 and the 200X/CX, I would get the 210. That's just a subjective look at the two side by side, and a comparison of the lift numbers, but IMHO, the 210 is the better deal.

Cheers

JDFANATIC

Should I buy the 210 loader
John Deere Tractors
Replies 16 Post by JDFANATIC

artic,

Also when leveling ground/gravel it stops the rake from "washboarding" -- an effect that just seems to keep getting worse on its own. Go with the wheels.

Cheers

JDFANATIC

jd2305 landscape rake
John Deere Tractors
Replies 3 Post by JDFANATIC

AC, Congrats! Of course you know the payback won't be in cubic zirconia!

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

jd2205
John Deere Tractors
Replies 2 Post by JDFANATIC

I'm not sure what exactly you mean by fragile mounting points, but I can attest that the 2210/210 can lift waaaay more than it is rated for. In fact one poster ran the numbers and found the loader would lift 750 lbs to full height (68"); 800 lbs to 61"; 850 lbs to 51"; 900 lbs to 45"; 950 lbs to 38"; and 1170 lbs to 16". Of course you had better have your ballast in place for this kind of lifting.

As for mowing, the 2210/62C will mow as fast as your topography allows; if your ground is smooth, great, if it isn't, have your fillings checked first.

JDFANATIC

jd2305
John Deere Tractors
Replies 21 Post by JDFANATIC

On my 210 loader I had the same issue and fixed it by adjusting the two 15MM bolts on the loader stand. Behind them the hole is slotted, so there is quite a bit of adjustment -- however -- you need to make sure the stand will still attach and detach, so it will take a little trial and error.

JDFANATIC

420 FEL not attached quite right
John Deere Tractors
Replies 13 Post by JDFANATIC

The configurator lists pricing now. Figure about $2500 less than the 4115! Wow! It gets the wheels turning!

Cheers

JDFANATIC

New 2520 John Deere
John Deere Tractors
Replies 4 Post by JDFANATIC

Why post this on the Deere site? Seems to me this should be on the Gray Market or General forums.

JDFANATIC
JD2210

Iron Horse Tractors
John Deere Tractors
Replies 6 Post by JDFANATIC

Well,

If I don't use this proceedure, with the exception of 95 degree days, I will be cranking for many seconds. Activating what my dealer calls "cold weather" proceedures, reduces this to a click of the starter.

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

2005 JD4010 starting problem
John Deere Tractors
Replies 14 Post by JDFANATIC

Right, though you could say the sloped hood is nice and the ability to separate the 3PH from the MMM (which will probably be able to be retrofitted to the 2210), some will like the multi-piece plastic hood, but others will not, but one thing that is indisputable, less hydraulic flow = lower 3PH and loader lift capacity. I'm sure the 2305 is a very nice machine, but better?

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

Buy the new 2305 over the 2210
John Deere Tractors
Replies 5 Post by JDFANATIC

The 2210 also has a lower center of gravity, so for slopes that "might" be an advantage. My previous CUT was a 755 which is comparable to the 4110/4115. I felt that was too large for my needs, and the 2210 seems sized "right". Both are great tractors.

Cheers

JDFANATIC

2210 or 4000 series
John Deere Tractors
Replies 7 Post by JDFANATIC

DRankin,<br>
<br>
USA? Here's a nameplate: it says Osaka, Japan?<br>
<br>
JDFANATIC<br>
<br>
edit: don't know why the link isn't working, next I'll try a hot link:<br>

2210 Replacement
John Deere Tractors
Replies 22 Post by JDFANATIC

Scooter,

Upper? That must be for the folding ROPS then. I just know the ROPS is really tall on the 2210, again taller than the tall ROPS my 755 had.

Cheers

JDFANATIC

John Deere 2210 Backhoe Review
John Deere Tractors
Replies 26 Post by JDFANATIC

Roger,

The toothbar makes an incredible difference when digging. I bought the Markham, but have seen the Woods and they look identical; for ~ $250 it will be one of your favorite attachments when the going gets rough!

Cheers,

JDFANATIC

2210 with R1 s--why did I wait so long
John Deere Tractors
Replies 17 Post by JDFANATIC

Scooter,

That's how I understand it. This is in anticipation of the new 2210 this August, which will be followed by the 4010, 4110, and 4115 replacements (take a guess at the numbers -- 2220, 2320, 2420, and 2520 perhaps?)

JDFANATIC

New 200CX loader for 2210
John Deere Tractors
Replies 7 Post by JDFANATIC

Chris,

This weekend I had the pleasure of spending some time with the MF2310 TLB. It was a very nice machine and the relative who purchased it, has and will certainly get a lot of productivity out of it. However, when it comes to engineering form, fit and function, as well as ergonomics, MF is a long way behind Deere. That is just my opinion, and I'll be the first to admit that the MF tractor will do the job very nicely, but it still is behind Deere in those aspects.

Cheers

JDFANATIC
JD2210

jd 2210 vs massey gc 2300
John Deere Tractors
Replies 7 Post by JDFANATIC