JD 4200 power vs. weight: John Deere Review  -- John Deere Tractors Discussion Forum and Review JD 4200 power vs. weight: John Deere Review -- John Deere Tractors Discussion Forum

  parts   |   manuals   |   discussion   |   photos   |   podcast   |   reviews   |   specs   |   dealers   |   classifieds   |   contact   |   faq   |   myProfile   |   home          Login Now | Sign Up


FAQ:   What is a tractor?

Forum Index
New As Posted | Active Subjects



www.emerichsales.com - New & Used Equipment
          View Tractors For Sale!


www.partsbynet.com - Lawn and Garden Equipment Parts


Bernardsville Landscape Lighting
Click to Post a New Message!

Discussion Boards > Active Subjects > Messages as Posted > John Deere Review Forum

Page [ 1 ] | 2 | | Next >>
Reply | Pop Up Window Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo
 10-13-1999, 00:00 Post: 8746
Steve



Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 179

2
Filter by User
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

A friend of mine is looking at purchasing a JD 4200 w/mfwd, hydro, and loader. I have read a few posts on this forum that indicates that the 4200 is underpowered for its weight. What do you 4200 owners think? Thanks.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-14-1999, 00:00 Post: 8786
doug



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

I have a jd 4300 and it has no power compared to the jd 955 that I should have kept. The 4300 does not work as smooth ( Loader) as the 955 and in general has been a pain in the ass to keep running It is also to heavy for the front turf tire size and cuts the turf when you turn it to tight. Find a 855 or 955 and sve yourself some money or wait for JD to improve the 4000 series before you buy.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-14-1999, 00:00 Post: 8787
Mike S.



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

My comparison would be between my previous 955 and my present 4400HST: They are entirely different critters and comparing them as similar tractors isn't easy--the 955 is a very fine lawn tractor whereas the 4300/4400's are ag tractors. Since the 4300 or 4400 weighs in about 1000 pounds heavier, it is more likely to scuff turf. In regards to power and handling, the 955 was more like a sports car--fast and nimble, whereas the 4400 is an ag tractor with less agility, but lots more torque. The loader on my 4400 is very smooth in operation, has higher capacity and with the ability of a very tight turn radius, it can do much more loader work in a shorter amount of time. However, with R4's on my 4400, I have to be very careful in turning to avoid tearing out turf in my yard. The lights on the 4300/4400 are far superior to those on the 955. The 955's 3-point sway chains and turnbuckles are (IMHO) much easier to use than the sway bars on the 4300/4400. The suspension seat of the 4300/4400 is far superior to that of the 955. The 955 didn't have a cool cupholderWink yeah right While I like my 4400 better than my 955, my 4400 was an early model and had some problems which the dealer quickly and efficiently corrected. Each of these two tractors are fine pieces of equipment and each has its good and less than good points, but on the balance, my vote goes with the 4400.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-14-1999, 00:00 Post: 8788
Randy



Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: myLocation
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 76
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

I have a JD4200 with a 60" mower and 420 loader. It has more than enought power for the mower. I also will spin the wheels in 4wd mid range 1st gear. The loader with heavy duty bucket has lifted a heaped bucket of wet gravel with now problem or hessitation. IMHO the 4000 series is a dramtic improvement over the 55 and 70 series. They are heavier, a definate plus for loader work, and more comfortable.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-16-1999, 00:00 Post: 8825
Frank



Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: la
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 64
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

The 4200 hydro does not have enough weight to stop its wheels from spinning when it cannot pull a load and never stalls from a lack of power. If someone thinks that the 4200 is underpowered at the wheels (not the PTO), they need to learn how to operate the tractor.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-16-1999, 00:00 Post: 8842
Mike in AL



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

I agree with Frank. I have a 4200 hydro 4wd with finish mower and 5' box blade. The mower has not bogged down the engine while mowing as fast as I felt comfortable driving. When using the box blade, the wheels would spin (in 4wd) before the engine stalls.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-17-1999, 00:00 Post: 8846
Steve



Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 179

2
Filter by User
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

Some of the comments that I have read on this board indicate that the 4200 has a hard time pulling a hill in the B range - requiring one to use the A range, which is very slow. Any comments appreciated. Thanks.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-17-1999, 00:00 Post: 8851
Brad



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

As a 4200 owner I would agree!






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-18-1999, 00:00 Post: 8903
Jason MacKenzie



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

I have a JOHN DEERE 4200HST, and it has the 420 LOADER, w/6 Heavy Duty Bucket,and also have a 72" mid-mount mower deck, with Loaded Rear tires.So basically I have a very heavy machine. I do have to say it works greatfor Loader work in both A + B range, but I do admit, B range is a litte to much for driving around on hills or rolling grade while dragging a belly mower or especially a rear rotary mower. But as far as Loader work goes, this machineis great, and is also able to carry any load in A range.






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

 10-28-1999, 00:00 Post: 9209
Lee



Join Date:
Location:
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1
 JD 4200 power vs. weight

I have a 4200 with a 72" belly and a 420 loader. I feel the tractor has plenty of power for mowing and loader work in both A and B speeds. I do feel the tractor is under-powered when it is in C gear and out on the road. I frequently road my tractor with the mower and loader attached and have problems climbing hills without easing back on the hydro pedal. Occasionally I have had to drop back to B gear and these hills aren't very steep. It doesn't sound like anyone else is experiencing this so maybe I will have to have the tractor checked out!






Reply to PostReply | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo




Bookmarks: Digg It | Del.icio.us | Technorati | Furl | Stumble This

Reply | Pop Up Window Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo


Page [ 1 ] | 2 | | Next >>

Discussion Boards > Active Subjects > Messages as Posted > John Deere Review Forum

Thread 8746 Filter by Poster:
Brad 1 | brett 1 | doug 1 | Frank 1 | Jason MacKenzie 1 | Lee 1 | Mike in AL 1 | Mike S. 1 | Randy 1 | Steve 2 |




Most Viewed

+ John Deere 2210 Backhoe Review
+ John Deere vs Kubota Compact Tractors
+ John Deere 790 fuel shut-off solenoid failing???
+ John Deere low viscosity HY GARD
+ John Deere JD 4100 Wiring diagram
+ JD 790 or Kubota L3000DT
+ Should I buy a John Deere 4105???
+ John Deere 4300 turns over but won't start
+ John Deere 455 garden tractor
+ Oil Change for Diesel Tractor

Most Discussion

+ John Deere 4300 scuffing......
+ Possible Solution To The 4000
+ Dealer out to lunch
+ Just got my new JD 4410 - Prob
+ Hello Green, Goodbye Orange
+ Receiver hitch for iMatch
+ 4300 wheel bolt problems
+ 4000 Ten Series 50 hour break
+ Don't buy JD compact tractors.
+ Oil Change for Diesel Tractor

Newest Topics

+ John Deere 4100 gear 3 point not workin
+ 2000 John Deer Gator 4 X2
+ Mini Excavator SY20C - Small Body with Big Power
+ John Deer 1070 starting problem
+ John Deere 990
+ Tractors R Us
+ john deere 4100 with 410 loader hydraulic problem
+ John Deere 2032R Buying advice
+ John Deere 2010 loss of hydraulics
+ L110 John Deer Tractor gas smell













Turbochargers for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Cab Glass for Tractors and Industrial Machines

Alternators for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Radiators for Tractors and Industrial Machines

Driveline Components for Tractors and Industrial Machines
Starter Motors for Tractors and Industrial Machines