Go Bottom Go Bottom

JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
Ron R
Join Date:
Posts: 1
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-04          25011

I just ordered a 5105 4wd with a 521 loader. I was getting a 4700 with a 460 but found out I could get the 5105 for less cash. The 5105 is bigger and heaver with a larger engine. I have a lot of snow and timber to remove. Hope I did right. Any comments out there.

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
Anthony M. Parente
Join Date:
Posts: 1
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-04          25012

I chose the 4700 over the 5105/5205 series for couple of reasons:
1) no backhoe was available for 5105/5205
2) I wanted the hydrostatic trans for loader work
3) no midmount mower was available for 5105/5205
Enjoy your machine. Do not second guess your decision.
Tony,
....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
Bird Senter
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 962
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-04          25013

You hope you did right? If it's the tractor you LIKE best, you did right. ....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
dsg
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 528 Franklin, Maine
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster  View my Photos  Pics

2001-03-04          25014

Ron, If you are doing some serious tree halling you will like the extra weight.
I have a 4700 and use the V4000 Fransgard winch to do a little firewood but would not put a real jag on it, it's to light. David ....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
Jerome
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 19 Quebec
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-05          25045

Ron If you don't mind my asking what did you end up paying for the 5105 4x4? ....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
Ron R
Join Date:
Posts: 1
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-05          25048

Jerome.I paid 24339 with the loader, the 4700 would had been 25400. ....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo



JD 4700 vs 5105

View my Photos
John Zeiter
Join Date:
Posts: 1
TractorPoint Premium Member -- 5 Tractors = Very Frequent Poster

2001-03-08          25231

Well Ron, I certainly feel you bought the right one. I also purchased a 4X4 5105 with the 421 loader. The extra weight of the tractor comes in handy when using the loader into piles of dirt and rock. I love mine and have had virtually no troubles with it. Plenty of grunt for hauling the heavy loads, too. ....

Reply to | Quote Post Reply to PostQuote Reply | Add PhotoAdd Photo


  Go Top Go Top

Share This
Share This







Member Login